As a South Asian country, Bangladesh is constitutionally committed to democratic governance. In a democratic system, state power originates from the people and is exercised through free and fair elections, equality before the law, accountability, majority rule with minority rights, and the protection of fundamental freedoms. Such a system ensures that the government serves the will of the citizens—either directly or through elected representatives.
According to these democratic principles and the Constitution, citizens have the right to express their opinions freely. They are entitled to protest against injustice, immorality, and misconduct by the state or any institution. In turn, the rulers are obligated to acknowledge public demands, address citizens’ problems, and respond to conditions that threaten social and political security. Commitments made to the people must be implemented, not merely announced.
However, the present situation in Bangladesh reflects growing injustice, widening disparities, and a serious breakdown of public trust. Dr. Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser of Bangladesh, has stated that he will ensure a credible, honest, and safe election by maintaining a stable environment and safeguarding public life. While such assurances sound reassuring, citizens no longer seek hopeful words—they seek visible action. Trust will not be restored through promises alone; it requires concrete evidence that the interim government can protect both the electoral process and those participating in it.
The recent and unpredictable attack on Osman Hadi—now regarded by many as a martyr—has intensified public fear and skepticism. Known for his honesty and strong commitment to national interests, Osman Hadi had emerged as a powerful and respected electoral candidate. His speeches reflected integrity, transparency, and a clear vision for the country, earning him widespread respect and public support. His tragic death has raised a pressing question: can candidates and voters truly be safe in the upcoming election?
Many fear that voters themselves may become targets of political violence. Concerns about economic instability, infrastructural vulnerability, and public safety is now a biggest problem in Bangladesh. Reports suggest increased pressure along national borders, with security forces remaining on high alert. On 21 December 2025, an Indian soldier, a member of BSF, was reportedly arrested after crossing the Zero line in Lalmonirhat. This incident raises serious concerns about sovereignty and regional security and violates international norms according to united nations.
In such a climate, transparency, accountability, and security are no longer optional—they are essential. Without them, public confidence in the electoral process will remain fragile, and democracy itself will stand at risk.
The government must act as it speaks by ensuring impartial investigations into political violence, guaranteeing equal security for all candidates and voters. They must demonstrate strict neutrality of state institutions. Transparency in decision-making, open communication with the public, and unrestricted access for independent media and election observers are essential to dispel fear and misinformation. Protecting freedom of expression, allowing peaceful dissent, and treating opposition voices with fairness will further signal democratic confidence. Most importantly, justice must be applied equally and without delay, proving that no individual or party stands above the law. In such critical times, even a single courageous decision that is rooted in accountability and honesty, which can restore faith and show citizens that democracy is not merely promised, but actively protected.
Democracy does not survive on promises; it survives on proof. This election is not merely about choosing representatives, it is about choosing whether Bangladesh will move forward as a nation governed by fear or by faith in its institutions. The time to secure public trust is not tomorrow, not after the election, but now.
